🏘️ Society · 🔬 Science📰 advocacy (78) · 💥 fluff (48) · 🏛️ right (99) · 🗯️ loaded language (91) · 🏷️ name-calling (86) · 🎪 sensationalism (83) · 🗡️ dysphemism (74) · 🧩 oversimplification (70) · 😤 rage bait (66) · 🤨 scare quotes (64) · 😱 appeal to fear (64) · 🧢 plain folks (63) · 🔁 repetition (62) · 🪝 clickbait (57) · 🪙 false dilemma (52) · 🎤 one-sided sources (52)theblaze.com · 20:00 UTC
🔬 Science📰 opinion (100) · 💥 consequential (34) · 🏛️ non-partisan (75) · 🗯️ loaded language (83) · 🎤 one-sided sources (80) · 🎪 sensationalism (71) · 🧩 oversimplification (70) · 🗡️ dysphemism (69) · 😤 rage bait (64) · 🐾 weasel words (61) · 🤨 scare quotes (60)newscientist.com · 13:00 UTC
🔬 Science📰 opinion (66) · 💥 notable (62) · 🏛️ non-partisan (75) · 🗯️ loaded language (50)sciencenews.org · 17:00 UTC
💻 Technology · 🔬 Science📰 opinion (100) · 💥 notable (55) · 🏛️ leans right (49) · 🎤 one-sided sources (74)washingtonexaminer.com · 20:00 UTC
🔬 Science
📰 opinion (77) · 💥 notable (53) · 🏛️ non-partisan (84) · 🎤 one-sided sources (64)nature.com · 00:00 UTC
📰 opinion (77) · 💥 notable (53) · 🏛️ non-partisan (84) · 🎤 one-sided sources (64)nature.com · 00:00 UTC🔬 Science📰 opinion (54) · 💥 fluff (93) · 🏛️ non-partisan (100) · 🎤 one-sided sources (74)wired.com · 09:00 UTC
🔬 Science
Chanda Prescod-Weinstein: observing dark matter requires deciding if it acts like a particle or wave 🔒
📰 opinion (87) · 💥 fluff (42) · 🏛️ non-partisan (100) · 🎤 one-sided sources (55)newscientist.com · 08:00 UTC🔬 Science📰 opinion (75) · 💥 fluff (49) · 🏛️ non-partisan (100) · 🧺 information laundering (70)nature.com · 00:00 UTC
💻 Technology · 🔬 Science📰 opinion (97) · 💥 fluff (40) · 🏛️ non-partisan (94) · 🎤 one-sided sources (80)nature.com · 00:00 UTC